# o1-mini vs Qwen Max

> o1-mini and Qwen Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.0 vs 34.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o1-mini-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Max leads 25.1 to 8.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 46.9% for o1-mini and 16.1% for Qwen Max.

## Snapshot

| | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.0 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 235 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 32.9% | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1362 | 1288 |
| WeirdML | 36.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 78.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1269 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 18.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 14% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 72.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.82 | — |
| LiveBench | 57.8% | — |

## Math

- o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 46.9% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1358 | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | 89.2% | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 1% |
| LiveBench Math | 62% | — |

## Knowledge

- o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 62.4% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | 1248 |
| Confabulations | 18.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1289 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1293 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1278 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1223 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1303 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1304 | 1262 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 65.4% | — |

## Long Context

- o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1317 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1277 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 64.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 40.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is o1-mini better than Qwen Max?

o1-mini and Qwen Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.0 vs 34.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is o1-mini or Qwen Max better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Qwen Max share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.