# Nova Premier 1.0 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-premier-1-0-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 23.0 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 189 | 185 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $12.50 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Reasoning

- Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |

## Multilingual

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1320 |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.