# Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3 8B

> Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-premier-1-0-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 22.3 to 16.1.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 185 | 237 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $12.50 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |

## Knowledge

- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3 8B?

Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.