# Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-premier-1-0-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova Premier 1.0 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 31.5 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 72.6% for Nova Premier 1.0 and 53.9% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper at $0.17 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 185 | 314 |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | $12.50 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 35% | 29.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |

## Knowledge

- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | 34.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Instruction Following

- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | 74.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 78.8% | 73.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.17 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.