# Nova Premier 1.0 vs o3-pro

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index. Nova Premier 1.0 costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-premier-1-0-vs-o3-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Nova Premier 1.0 scores higher in 1 category and o3-pro in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 35.4 to 29.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 44.8% for Nova Premier 1.0 and 72.1% for o3-pro.
- Nova Premier 1.0 is cheaper at $2.50 / $12.50 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

## Snapshot

| | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 42.7 |
| Rank | 185 | 94 |
| Context | 1M | 200K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $20 |
| Output $/M | $12.50 | $80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |

## Reasoning

- Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182)
- o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.43 |

## Math

- Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |

## Knowledge

- Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176)
- o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201)
- o3-pro: —

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Nova Premier 1.0: —
- o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174)
- o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index. Nova Premier 1.0 costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or o3-pro?

Nova Premier 1.0 is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and o3-pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.
