# Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-lite-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 43.0.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 161 | 156 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1385 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | — |
| LMArena French | 1381 | — |
| LMArena German | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1271 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1373 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | — |

## Long Context

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.