# Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen Turbo

> Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 9.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-lite-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Nova 2 Lite leads 37.5 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 161 | 335 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | $0.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1385 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | — |

## Math

- Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)
- Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | — |
| LMArena French | 1381 | — |
| LMArena German | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1271 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1373 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | — |

## Long Context

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen Turbo?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 9.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.