# Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen-14B

> Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-lite-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova 2 Lite leads 53.9 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 161 | 275 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1385 | 1071 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1381 | — |
| LMArena German | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1271 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1373 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen-14B?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2 Lite or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.