# Nova 2 Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-lite-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Nova 2 Lite leads 47.3 to 38.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 161 | 191 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.1 (#131)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1386 | 1292 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2 Lite: 23.9 (#114)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2 Lite: 26.4 (#120)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | 1272 |

## Math

- Nova 2 Lite: 34.8 (#154)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2 Lite: 42.5 (#88)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1360 | 1294 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2 Lite: 47.3 (#148)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1381 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1343 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1372 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2 Lite: 70.7 (#156)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#145)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2 Lite: 54.1 (#150)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2 Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2 Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.