# Nova 2 Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-lite-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 36.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 161 | 168 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1385 | 1347 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | 1322 |

## Math

- Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | 1308 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1381 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1343 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1373 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1271 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2 Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Nova 2 Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.