# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 41.0 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 0% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and 5.4% for Qwen3.8 27B.
- Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 46.0 |
| Rank | 244 | 68 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | 46.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1593 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1482 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 47.5% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 5.4% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 42.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1456 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1482 |

## Multimodal

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1271 |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1504 |
| LMArena French | — | 1465 |
| LMArena German | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1450 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1384 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1441 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.8 27B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.