# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 27.3 to 21.7.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 241 | 152 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.