# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 27B

> Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 27.5 to 22.4.
- Qwen3.5 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 244 | 127 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1358 |
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
- Qwen3.5 27B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1414 |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |

## Multimodal

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1241 |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1410 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1393 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1410 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.