# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3-4B

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3-4B leads 27.3 to 21.9.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 241 | 261 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3-4B?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.