# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

> Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-30b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 29.8 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 42.7% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and 33.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 244 | 179 |
| Context | — | 41K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | 33.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 29.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1398 |
| DTBench | — | 69.3% |
| LMCA | — | 22.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.63 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 47.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1394 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 70.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1396 |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1433 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1404 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1363 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 40.6% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1317 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1378 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.