# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3 14B leads 29.4 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 42.7% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and 31.6% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 241 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | 31.6% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.