# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 22.4 to 19.2.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 244 | 336 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.