# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 21.9 to 18.6.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 244 | 302 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | — | $8.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Multimodal

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.