# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 31.1.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 241 | 288 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1131 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1100 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen1.5-32B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.