# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 30.3.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 241 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1270 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1289 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen Max better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.