# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen-14B

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 30.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 241 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1072 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen-14B?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen-14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.