# Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nova-2-0-pro-preview-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 25.4 to 21.7.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 241 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |

## Math

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |

## Multilingual

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |

## Instruction Following

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.