# Nemotron 3 Super vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/nemotron-3-super-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 38.9 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 153 | 306 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.45 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |

## Reasoning

- Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1380 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | — |
| LMArena French | 1405 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | — |

## Long Context

- Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Nemotron 3 Super better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Nemotron 3 Super or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.