# Muse Spark vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 33.4.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 46 | 245 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 119.49 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1221 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.