# Muse Spark vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Muse Spark and 2.5% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 29.0 |
| Rank | 46 | 320 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 118.51 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |

## Math

- Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 2.5% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 35.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.