# Muse Spark vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 31.2.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 46 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1184 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1168 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
- Qwen1.5-110B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1123 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1142 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen1.5-110B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.