# Muse Spark 1.3 vs QwQ-32B

> Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-3-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 72.4 to 36.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 99.2% for Muse Spark 1.3 and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 54.4 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 27 | 153 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| CursorBench | 41.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1655 | — |
| SciCode | 59.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 57.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 27.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1503 | 1326 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.89 | 137.6 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 24.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 25% | — |
| DTBench | 96.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.14 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 99.2% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1497 | 1359 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1471 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1485 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1527 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1534 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1513 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1485 | 1353 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1481 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1491 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1450 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1906 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than QwQ-32B?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark 1.3 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.1 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and QwQ-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.