# Muse Spark 1.2 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-2-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 56.4% for Muse Spark 1.2 and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 49.8 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 44 | — |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 56.4% | 42.4% |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1532 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 12% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1497 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 36.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 16% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 17.7% | 3.7% |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1490 | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 48.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.18 | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 43% | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1304 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1519 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1444 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1840 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1504 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.