# Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-2-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 60.3% for Muse Spark 1.2 and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 48 | 232 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 56.4% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | 34.4% |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1533 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1495 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 36.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 16% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 17.7% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 48.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.87 | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 43% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1471 | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1478 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1513 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1461 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1840 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1494 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.