# Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3 32B

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-2-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 32B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 20.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 48.4% for Muse Spark 1.2 and 17.3% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 48 | 172 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 56.4% | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1495 | 1358 |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1533 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 12% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 36.4% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
| GDP.pdf | 16% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 17.7% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1334 |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 67.5% |
| LMCA | 48.4% | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.87 | 138.51 |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1471 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| ProofBench | 43% | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
- Qwen3 32B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1478 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 1487 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1513 | — |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1461 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1494 | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1840 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3 32B?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3 32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.