# Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen-14B

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-2-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 48 | 275 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1495 | 1071 |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1533 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 12% | — |
| SciCode | 56.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 36.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 16% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.87 | 113.03 |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.2% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 48.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1471 | 1068 |
| ProofBench | 43% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1478 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1513 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1461 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1494 | 1022 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1840 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen-14B?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.