# Muse Spark 1.2 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-2-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 25.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 48 | 191 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1495 | 1291 |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1533 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 12% | — |
| SciCode | 56.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 36.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 16% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1272 |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.2% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 48.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.87 | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1471 | 1305 |
| ProofBench | 43% | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | 1295 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1478 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1513 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1487 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | 1289 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1461 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1494 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1840 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.