# Muse Spark 1.1 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-1-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 51 | 274 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | 1035 |
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| SciCode | 58.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| CritPt | 15.1% | — |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.21 | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1483 | 1017 |
| ProofBench | 39% | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1437 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1485 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.