# Muse Spark 1.1 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-1-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 26.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 58.8% for Muse Spark 1.1 and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 51 | — |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 58.8% | 42.4% |
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 15.1% | 3.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | — |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.21 | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1483 | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | — |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1437 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1485 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.