# Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 36× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-1-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 84.9% for Muse Spark 1.1 and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 51 | 156 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| SciCode | 58.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | 43.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.21 | 144.64 |
| CritPt | 15.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1483 | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | — |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1483 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1437 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1485 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 36× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.