# Muse Spark 1.1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-1-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 53.1 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 51 | 254 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $1.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | 1210 |
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| SciCode | 58.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1208 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| CritPt | 15.1% | — |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.21 | — |

## Math

- Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1483 | 1208 |
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multimodal

- Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1483 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1494 | — |
| LMArena German | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1437 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1485 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.