# Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 36.1.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 128 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Glimmer: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.