# Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-Flash in 7 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 32.9 to 27.2.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 128 | 105 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | 1243 |
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Glimmer: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | 1404 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1446 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1379 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.