# Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 38.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 44.9% for Muse Glimmer and 27.5% for Qwen3.5-9B.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 131 | 236 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 44.9% | 27.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Glimmer: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.46 |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1417 | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.5-9B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.