# Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 131 | 336 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Glimmer: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1417 | — |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.