# Muse Glimmer vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 36.1 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 128 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | — |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.7 vs 38.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.