# Muse Glimmer vs Qwen Plus

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 23.3.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 131 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen Plus?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.