# Muse Glimmer vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.6 to 42.8.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 128 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | 1346 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | 1322 |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | 1307 |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Glimmer or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.7 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.