# Muse Glimmer vs o1-mini

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/muse-glimmer-vs-o1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 8.8.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 34.0 |
| Rank | 131 | 235 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
- o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Muse Glimmer: —
- o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
- o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |

## Math

- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
- o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
- o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |

## Multilingual

- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
- o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1283 |
| LMArena French | — | 1293 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1303 |

## Instruction Following

- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
- o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |

## Long Context

- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
- o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1320 |

## Writing & Preference

- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
- o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Muse Glimmer better than o1-mini?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Muse Glimmer or o1-mini better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.