# Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mixtral-8x7b-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 34.4.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.8 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 328 | 72 |
| Context | 32K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1127 | 1488 |
| HumanEval+ | 39.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 49.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1115 | 1483 |
| DTBench | 49.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.38 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | 86.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 77.2% | — |

## Math

- Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1147 | 1473 |
| Omni-MATH | 10.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 10% | — |
| GSM8K | 74.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1088 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 33.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 29.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 87.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 85.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1077 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1055 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1165 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 931 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 968 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1090 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1110 | 1467 |
| IFEval | 57.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1103 | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1132 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1109 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1115 | 1478 |
| WildBench | 67.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.