# Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mixtral-8x7b-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 11.0.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 334 | 181 |
| Context | 32K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1126 | 1314 |
| HumanEval+ | 39.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 49.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1115 | 1299 |
| DTBench | 49.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | 86.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 77.2% | — |

## Math

- Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1147 | 1298 |
| Omni-MATH | 10.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 10% | — |
| GSM8K | 74.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1088 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 33.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 29.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 87.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 85.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1077 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1055 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 931 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1090 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 968 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1109 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 57.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1103 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1132 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1109 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1115 | 1299 |
| WildBench | 67.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.