# Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mixtral-8x7b-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 11.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 10% for Mixtral 8x7B and 67.2% for Qwen Max.
- Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Qwen Max accepts more context: 33K tokens versus 32K.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.8 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 328 | 226 |
| Context | 32K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1127 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 39.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 49.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1115 | 1270 |
| DTBench | 49.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.38 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | 86.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 77.2% | — |

## Math

- Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1147 | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10% | 67.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 10.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
| GSM8K | 74.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.6% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1088 | 1248 |
| MMLU-Pro | 33.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 29.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 87.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 85.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1077 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1055 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1165 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 931 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 968 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1090 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1110 | 1262 |
| IFEval | 57.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1103 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1132 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1109 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1115 | 1277 |
| WildBench | 67.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen Max?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

### Is Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen Max better for coding?

Mixtral 8x7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Max does, with 33K tokens against 32K.

### How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen Max share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.