# Mixtral 8x7B vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mixtral-8x7b-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 11.0.

## Snapshot

| | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 334 | 131 |
| Context | 32K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1126 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 39.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 49.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1115 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| DTBench | 49.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | 86.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 77.2% | — |

## Math

- Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1147 | 1417 |
| Omni-MATH | 10.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 10% | — |
| GSM8K | 74.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1088 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 30.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 33.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 29.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 87.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 85.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1077 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1055 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1090 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1166 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 931 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 968 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1109 | 1375 |
| IFEval | 57.5% | — |

## Long Context

- Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1103 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x7B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1132 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1109 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1115 | 1399 |
| WildBench | 67.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mixtral 8x7B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.