# Mixtral 8x22B vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mixtral-8x22b-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x22B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 37.9 to 15.1.

## Snapshot

| | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 26.7 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 330 | 128 |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1166 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| WeirdML | 3.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 64.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1150 | 1395 |
| DTBench | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |

## Math

- Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1184 | 1419 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 24.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1113 | 1388 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 46% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 33.4% | — |
| MMLU | 77.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1128 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1116 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1165 | — |
| LMArena German | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1147 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 72.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1144 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1162 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1141 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1130 | 1398 |
| WildBench | 71.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mixtral 8x22B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.