# Mistral vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 16.6.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 303 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1162 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Mistral: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1149 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1180 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 7.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1125 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 27.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Mistral: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1129 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1109 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1180 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1155 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1013 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1032 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1168 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1152 | 1440 |
| IFEval | 56.8% | — |

## Long Context

- Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1153 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Mistral | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1165 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1158 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1147 | 1460 |
| WildBench | 66% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.